Wednesday, May 7, 2008
As cazy as it sounds, Kant believes the basis of all knowledge is synthetic a priori. Aren’t we taught all academic knowledge in school and all other knowledge by observation? Kant seems to think that teachers almost serve as guides and that they help bring out the knowledge that you already have. Kant also argues that natural sciences, namely physics, are synthetic a priori. However, I must bring up how Hume points out the pool ball example, which contradicts this statement. Hume claims we do not know a priorily which angle the ball will move at until we observe the action, thus deeming this knowledge to be synthetic a posteriori.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I would like to go with HUme on this one. I do not believe that we as children would have ever learned mathematics if not learned by our teachers. Math is not something that is just in the back of your head forever, you must learn and understand it in order for it to be stored in your mind...
Post a Comment